Escalating Anxiety to God

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 0 comments

by Eric Hansen

Anxiety seems to be a topic I either talk or write about frequently. It’s definitely a part of me that evil tries to use against me, and it succeeds so very much. In fact, earlier in the day that I wrote this article, I had some pretty intense panic attacks and didn’t even know why!

At the start of this year, I committed to God that I would treat Him as the ultimate authority above all else. Whether that be decision making, desires, paths to cross, etc., I decided to make a conscious effort to consult and pray with petitions for it all (Philippians 4:6-7). While I have failed at that more often than not, ultimately this is an important piece to recent events that have caused some significant anxiety within me.

With that commitment in mind to God, it had been a drastic whirlwind inside. There were moments where I was as cool as a cucumber, and other moments where I was as frantic as a person drowning and unable to swim (speaking from experience). The balance has definitely been a struggle in being able to keep grounded in faith. The turning point, though, for all of this happened after “suffering” constantly for a few weeks.

I really hadn’t been in God’s Word like I knew I should have. How else am I really going to hear God if I’m not focusing on Him? Even though I had been praying to God all throughout this to either keep the path clear or destroy it as you please if it’s not your will, I needed to be obedient to God. I woke up one morning at 4:30 AM in a panic attack. The first thing I did was dig into my devotional book of Jesus’s parables. I can’t say that the parables helped, but just reading the Scriptures and thinking and meditating on them started to bring me peace. The parable I read was about the persistent widow (Luke 18:1-8). The significance to reading this in my emotional state was realizing I needed to be more persistent in praying to God and what I pray on. If I truly wanted God to be my guiding light through life, then I needed to seek Him more constantly.

I wish at this point I could say that everything was peachy, that the weight of anxiety started lifting. But reality had other plans, slapping me with more anxiety and testing my commitment and reliance on God. There were some periods in that escalation when I felt like giving up on life, asking if things are worth this. Not only did the original matter become a bigger part of the anxiety, but another problem arose as well that made it even worse. These are the times where you often just know evil is trying to create that division.

Ultimately, though, it helped me to remember what sin is. (Check out recent writings by fellow blog writer Charlie Wolcott for more on this.) At its core, sin is any separation between God and man (or me in this case). This means that the increased anxiety trying to consume my thoughts, dreams, and life was trying to separate me from God by directing my very soul to the problems I was dealing with. The sad thing is, I had no control over either problem, so I was having all this anxiety regarding things that I couldn’t do anything about to begin with. So then why was I allowing this division, this sin, to happen to begin with?!

It was at these revelations that I realized I needed to just focus on God. I needed to acknowledge the anxiety, fears, and thoughts but let the Prince of (amazing) Peace come save me. After all, if I'm telling people He’s my Lord and Savior, why am I not depending on Him as such?

I have a Korean-English bilingual bible that has hymns in it. My thought wasn’t to go to them, but I ended up opening the Bible to one of them. In fact, what I opened up to was a hymn called 너 근심 걱정 말아라 (Be Not Dismayed Whatever Betide) that has a repeating phrase of “God will take care of you.” I would say this greatly reminded me, especially as I kept re-reading the hymn, that God will in fact take care of me. This then led me to reading the psalm it is inspired by (Psalm 91), which I read a few times. In fact, I even read it today while having a pretty noticeable panic attack. Through my reading, I have been praying to God, praising and bringing my fears to Him.

Things aren’t perfect by any means, and I’m still fighting anxiety pretty heavily. But reading Psalm 91 brought me to reading through Ephesians (with a heavy heart towards chapter 6). This whole exchange has tested my ability to rely on God, to trust Him with things in my life, and to realize just how wonderful and peaceful He is when I’m in His presence. I don’t regret having had to go through all of this, and the talks I’ve had with people also guide me in it. Right now, my spirit basically demands more Scripture, and I try hard to satisfy that thirst.


This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


Hebrews 13:7-10

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Monday, May 16, 2022 0 comments

by Katie Erickson

“Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by eating ceremonial foods, which is of no benefit to those who do so. We have an altar from which those who minister at the tabernacle have no right to eat.” -Hebrews 13:7-10

While the previous section of Hebrews 13 focused on the theme of love, the first few verses this section talks about leaders – specifically, how we as Christians should treat our leaders. Then, the author moves on to talk about faith and God’s grace.

The first thing to note is the Greek word used for leaders in verse 7. This is a general term for leader that does not distinguish what type of leader that person is. It can be used for the leader of a religious body (like the church), a political leader, a military commander, etc. There is a different Greek word that’s used elsewhere in Scripture for “elders,” so this word likely does not refer to elders in the church specifically.

Given the next phrase, “who spoke the word of God to you,” these leaders were likely involved in some form of teaching or preaching. “The word of God here” refers to the gospel message as a whole; remember that at the time this letter was being written, the New Testament was not yet formed, and some of it was not even written yet. So speaking the word of God could refer to the Old Testament Scriptures, the gospel message, or even the early documents that were already in existence that would be included in our New Testament today.

These leaders were being held up as an example for believers to imitate. Some scholars think that the word “outcome” here is actually a euphemism for death, meaning that the readers should consider how their former leaders were killed for their faith. That brings a bit of a different message here to the author asking the readers to imitate their faith that led to the outcome of death! But the reader is also encouraged to remember their way of life, how they truly lived out their faith and did not compromise it – even in the face of death. Whoever these leaders were, they were clearly good examples of faith to follow.

While being charged to remember their earthly leaders, the author tells his readers that “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever” (verse 8). The reader can be assured that they will be following the same Jesus who those leaders followed, the same Jesus as was constantly portrayed in the word of God. This short verse emphasizes the unchanging nature of Jesus. The same Jesus who existed before the creation of the world is the same Jesus who took on human flesh, died, and was resurrected. He is the same Jesus who was worshipped and followed by the early church, He is the same Jesus we worship and follow today, and He is the same Jesus we will worship in the future – both in the rest of our earthly lives and into eternity in heaven.

It is clear from verse 9 that there were some “strange teachings” present in that day that the audience would be familiar with; we do not know today what those teachings were. It is possible that this relates to Paul’s argument in 1 Corinthians 10:14-33 about eating food sacrificed to idols, but there is no strong link there. Many religions of the day, including Judaism, had rules and regulations surrounding food.

The author’s point here is that we need to rely on God’s grace to sustain us rather than getting caught up in the rules about food or other such things. This is reminiscent of what Jesus said while He was being tempted in the wilderness in Matthew 4:4: “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God,’” where He quoted Deuteronomy 8:3. There is no benefit in God’s eyes to eating ceremonial foods; we need to continually rely on God’s grace rather than following rules about what we eat or do not eat.

Verse 10 seems confusing in this context. What is this altar that the author is talking about? This has been interpreted as the Holy Communion table, from which only believers in Jesus Christ partake of the meal of communion. But, he just finished saying in the previous verse that we shouldn’t worry about food rules, and now he said that some can’t eat from this altar.

One commonly held view is that the altar referred to here is the cross of Jesus Christ. “Those who minister at the tabernacle” are the Jewish priests, or possibly all Jews in a general sense. They haev no right to “eat” from this “altar” because they do not accept the sacrifice of Jesus as providing for their salvation. The fact that Jesus was crucified, died, and was raised again does not mean anything significant to them, as they still believe that the Messiah had not yet come.

The author is pointing out that his readers, as believers in Jesus Christ as the one true Messiah, have a privileged position over those who do not yet share this belief. They should consider their faith as a privilege that others do not yet have, but they do have the ability to welcome others to the table, to welcome them to a saving faith in Jesus Christ as well.

While the ideas presented in these few short verses seem rather disjointed (remember your leaders, Jesus never changes, don’t get caught up in food rules, and we are privileged because of faith), they are all connected in instructing believes about how to live the Christian life. We are called to imitate those who have been leaders of the faith; they trusted in the unchanging Jesus, and we should do so as well. We need to remain true in our teachings and not get caught up in any false teachings that may happen, including becoming to legalistic about what we can or cannot eat.

It really is all about the cross of Jesus Christ and the saving faith we can have through God’s grace to us!

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


Sin 9: Severe Consequences of Getting Sin Wrong: Old Earth Ideas

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Friday, May 13, 2022 1 comments

by Charlie Wolcott

Having a false view of sin has devastating consequences. Over the last few weeks, I’ve showcased what happens when one takes sin lightly, changes the terminology, changes the effects, and changes the point or purpose of the cross. In a very brief nutshell, the consequence of taking such an approach is going to Hell, but there is much more to it than just that. I mentioned early in this series that there is no sin that just affects us. If we get sin wrong, it affects much more than just our theology and our destination.

I’ll return to origins because this is where I believe the lynchpin lies over the whole issue of sin. While there are Old Earth Creationists who do correctly define sin as knowingly and intentionally going against what God said, they have already lost the battle on how that applies to every person. While there are Old Earth Creationists who do understand the plan of salvation despite getting Genesis wrong, because they get Genesis wrong, they are preaching a confusing and incoherent message that has enabled the liberals to do what they do anyway. John MacArthur points out the problem here:

"What old-earth creationists (including, to a large degree, even the evangelical ones) are doing with Genesis 1-3 is precisely what religious liberals have always done with all of Scripture--spiritualizing and reinterpreting the text allegorically to make it mean what they want it to mean. This is a dangerous way to handle Scripture. And it involves a perilous and unnecessary capitulation to the religious presuppositions of naturalism--not to mention a serious dishonor to God."
~John MacArthur, Think Biblically!, pages 62-63

While proclaiming conservative evangelicalism, what Old Earth teachings have done is strip away the Bible’s authority on defining sin. This has enabled liberal ideas to so completely infiltrate the conservative church that the few churches who are still faithful to the truth essentially no longer have a voice that others are respecting. While this is a severe issue in terms of general approaches to the Bible, what many Old Earth Creationists do not understand is that their view is not just a liberal approach to Genesis; their models also directly deny the Gospel because they have a false view of sin and its origin. I keep addressing this issue because what I keep seeing in the teachers and promoters of Old Earth theology (not talking about the laymen who do not see what is going on behind the scenes) are the consistent marks of the false teachers that Scripture readily offers us. These teachers will play the “unity” card, however they are the ones bringing teachings that were contrived intentionally to deny and refute the Gospel without directly attacking it. The central issue is: What is sin and when did death enter this world?

When you use the current observations of how science operates TODAY and then extrapolate that as far back as you can (requiring there be no change in how the region, let alone the world, operates), you are using observations of a sin-cursed scientist and a sin-cursed world, with thousands of years of buildup from said corruption. These models reject the Biblical account of creation as written and the historical event of the Flood. The Old Earth Creationists then try to come back and insert these accounts into their already established models that were designed without the Bible’s input. As a result, they completely change the account to where it is completely unrecognizable to the original text. What does this have to do with sin? Everything.

When one assumes a “Deep Time” paradigm, no matter what flavor it takes, a KEY assumption behind all those dating methods and processes is that the present is key to the past – that what we see happening today is how everything has always happened. One argument made is that “God made the laws of physics, and God does not lie or change, therefore the laws of physics don’t change.” That is totally ridiculous because that put the creation at the same tier as the Creator and gives the creation the “incommunicable” attributes of God. This is important.

We are observing a sin-cursed, broken, breaking down world. If the laws of physics as we know them today reflect this, and this is a reflection of God, then this is actually an attack on who God is. Think about it. These creation models call for a corrupt creation from the start; thus by equating the creation to the Creator, they call the Creator corrupt. There is a group with an origins model that matches this precisely: the Gnostics (established heretics). They do not believe that corruption came from man but from a corrupt creator, the Demiurge (basically, the Biblical Satan). They think man’s problem is not sin but lack of knowledge (hence the name Gnostics, which comes from the Greek word for knowledge). Take notice of the primary approach that Old Earth Creationists take to solve man’s problems: it’s not the Gospel, it’s “science.” There are Old Earth Creationists who do proclaim the plan of salvation, however that plan of salvation and the Gospel message have no relationship whatsoever to the Old Earth models they teach. They directly contradict each other.

Why am I saying all this? Because of a false view of origins. All the Deep Time models have a false view of sin. They teach by practice that Adam and Eve’s sin ultimately did nothing to this physical world and try to reduce sin to be purely “spiritual.” Paul explicitly taught otherwise in Romans 8:19-23 AND in 1 Corinthians 15. I even had an Old Earther try to cite 1 Corinthians 15:3-6 to say, “Here is the Gospel and there is no mention of origins, therefore it’s secondary.” And I’m like, “Did you read the rest of the chapter?” Adam’s sin did cause spiritual death, but it ALSO caused physical death as well as every other kind of death. An animal had to die physically to provide clothes for Adam and Eve. Jesus’ death had to be physical. If it was just a spiritual issue, then why did Jesus have to die physically and historically? When asked this question, I have still yet to hear an Old Earther give any attempt to answer it out of their paradigm. Why? They can’t. If the earth is millions of years old, Jesus had no purpose in coming here as a man. If I have not made it clear yet: Old Earth ideas are antithetical to the Gospel because they fail to see what sin truly is and what it did. There are Christians who are Old Earthers. But don’t read what I’m not saying; they believe it out of deception, and I pray God frees them from said deception. But even the atheists understand that “millions of years” and “evolution” being true means the Gospel is dead.

"It becomes clear now that the whole justification of Jesus’ life and death is predicated on the existence of Adam and the forbidden fruit he and Eve ate. Without original sin, who needs to be redeemed? Without Adam’s fall into a life of constant sin terminated by death, what purpose is Christianity? None…
Christianity fought, fights, and will fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus' earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the son of God. If Jesus was not the redeemer who died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing!
What this means is that Christianity cannot lose the Genesis account of creation like it could lose the doctrine of geocentricism and get along. The battle must be waged, for Christianity is fighting for its very life."
~G. Richard Bozarth, American Atheist: The Meaning of Evolution, February 1978, page 30)

We cannot mess around with Genesis. So many in the institutionalized churches think that is perfectly admissible and that they should be considered “brethren” as they do so. How can anyone be united “in Christ” when one side denies the very reason why He had to come to begin with?

The consequences of getting sin wrong are devastating. I’ll expound on this further, but take notice what has happened to any church, denomination, institution, or ministry that started out as Christian then embraced Old Earth ideas any time between the 1850s to the 1950s. Where are they now? Look at Yale, Princeton, or Harvard – they all started as Christian universities. Look at many of the seminaries today. Look at the many denominations which embraced Old earth ideas. Where are they now? They are centers of liberalism. They are no longer conservative, and it could be debated whether they could be called “Christian” anymore. So much of what they teach is what a normal conservative evangelical today would call heretical. Just in the past couple years, the Southern Baptist Convention, known as the largest denomination in the US and knows as perhaps the last large bastion for truth embraced Critical Race Theory ideas. Where does that come from? Evolutionary and Marxist ideals.

“Millions of years” is a theory where death and decay are the creative mechanisms for bringing about life and the universe. And everywhere it has gone, it has produced death and decay. I will call belief in these models what it is: sin. It is specifically the sin of unbelief of God’s record in Genesis. It is the sin of believing pagan, ungodly men instead of Scripture. It is the sin of sitting in the council of scorners, mockers, and scoffers. It is the sin of elevating man’s ideals as equal if not higher than God’s standards. Ultimately, it is the sin of knowing God exists and rejecting Him as Creator. Next week, I will emphasize the Prosperity Gospel and Progressive Christianity and the devastating consequences of how those teachings get sin wrong, and then I’ll tackle Critical Race Theory and Liberation Theology.

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


The Importance of Pruning in Your Life

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 0 comments

by Jason DeZurik

“Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit.” -John 15:2

In 2015, my wife and I were blessed to move our family out to the country. On the property was a massive lilac bush, and we were very excited to enjoy the blooms we anticipated were sure to come in the future. Well, the first spring, not many blooms came. The next spring even less came. It went this way for the next couple of years. So, I decided in the fall of 2019 that I would prune the bush back quite a bit. This bush was at least 12 feet tall, and I cut all the branches of this bush back to about 6 feet tall. Some people were worried that I might have killed the bush, but I was to the point of attempting to replace the bush anyway, so I thought might as well go for broke.

In the spring of 2020, I don't know if we got any blooms. The next spring in 2021, new growth had happened but not many blooms were found on the bush. This spring, though, there are so many blooms on the bush that they literally change the smell of the air all around our home and their fragrance is powerful.

This got me thinking about our own lives and how God works in and through them. Friends, yes, the Lord will prune and even discipline those He loves so we can have the opportunity to have much good fruit in our lives. But please keep in mind, too, that the Lord has already shown us how to live. At times we need to “prune” things out of our lives in order to receive the good “blooms” that the Lord desires for us to have in our lives.

Please don't get discouraged when you don't see much fruit soon after making good godly decisions in your life. Sometimes, just like the lilac bush in our yard, it takes time for the good gifts to come. So, rejoice in the Lord always; I will write it again, rejoice!

“Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice. Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand; do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.” -Philippians 4:4-7

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


Hebrews 13:1-6

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Monday, May 9, 2022 0 comments

by Katie Erickson

“Keep on loving one another as brothers and sisters. Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it. Continue to remember those in prison as if you were together with them in prison, and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.
Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral. Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, 'Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you.'
So we say with confidence, 'The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid. What can mere mortals do to me?'”
-Hebrews 13:1-6

This final chapter of the book of Hebrews contains more advice on how to live righteous living, continuing that theme from the last section of chapter 12. The theme of these first few verses is love and how we should live out the love of Christ for one another.

Verse 1 starts out with a clear command: “Keep on loving one another as brothers and sisters.” If you don’t have a great relationship with your siblings, perhaps that command sounds easy to follow – if you don’t feel like you love your brothers and sisters, then maybe this Christian love thing is not that hard! But “brothers and sisters” in this verse refers to our brothers and sisters in Christ – all of our fellow believers. We are not linked by close blood relations, but we are all linked thorugh the blood of Christ that was shed for us.

In Greek, however, verse 1 is just 3 words. The idea of it is simply to remain in brotherly love for one another. In English, we just have the word “love,” but in Greek there are actually 8 words that refer to different forms of love (though just a few of them are used in the Scriptures). We most often see agape love, which refers to the unconditional, sacrificial love of God. This occurrence, however is the phileo love, which is the friendship love. The actual Greek word used is philadelphia which does literally mean “brotherly love.” We should strive toward having that brotherly, friendship love with all believers, because we are brothers and sisters in Christ.

How do we show this brotherly love to one another? One way is to show hospitality to others, as in verse 2. The reference to unknowingly showing hospitality to angels looks back at the narratives of Abraham and Lot in Genesis 18 and 19. God is pleased when we show hospitality to others, which can take on many forms. It could mean providing lodging for a fellow believer in your home, providing a meal for someone, or serving someone in any way.

In the context of the time period of the letter to the Hebrews, hospitality was one thing that truly helped spread the gospel throughout the known world. As the early Christian preachers traveled from place to place, they were able to do so because of fellow believers providing them with lodging and meals. Many of the inns of the day were expensive, and they did not have great reputations as being reputable places, so believers showing hospitality to others facilitated the mission of Jesus Christ to spread the gospel.

In verse 3, the author turns his attention to showing love specifically to those in prison. A person would need to actively seek out those who were imprisoned in order to help them; obviously, prisoners won’t just come knocking on our door asking for a place to stay or for a meal. In that time period, prisoners often did not receive much (if any) food, so they would depend on the love of others for their basic necessities. It was dangerous to help prisoners, as anyone seen sympathizing with prisoners could be imprisoned themselves, but the author encourages them to help prisoners anyway.

This verse goes along with the teaching of Paul in 1 Corinthians 12:26 where he wrote about all believers being the body of Christ: “If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.” We are encouraged to care for those who are suffering in prison and those who are suffering in other ways or other places. We share in their suffering as the body of Christ.

The author turns to upholding marriage and discouraging sexual sin in verse 4. Marriage should be kept pure, not only for the sake of the marriage but because committing any sort of sexual sin will be judged harshly by God. The author specifically calls out adultery but also the general “sexual immorality.” For more on what the Bible says about these topics, check out this post and this post.

Verse 5 addresses sins of greed and coveteousness. Anyone who covets after something pursues that thing selfishly, regardless of what it does to other people. When we love money and all the possessions and security it can provide for us, we are trusting money and the things of this world more than we are trusting God. When we are content with what God has given us, we will not love money and desire after other things. For more on what the Bible says about money, check out this post.

The quotation in this verse is interesting, as it is not an exact quotation from any verse in the Old Testament. It is similar to Deuteronomy 31:6 where it says that God “will never leave you nor forsaken you.” Or it could refer to Joshua 1:5 where God says, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” It is suspected that the author is quoting from a manuscript that has since been lost. But even if we don’t have those exact words recorded elsewhere in Scripture, the idea rings true. We can fully trust in God that He will never leave us nor forsake us, therefore we do not need to trust in the material things of this world.

Finally, in verse 6, we see the author quoting Psalm 118:6-7. This emphasizes that we can confidently count on the Lord for all things. There is no reason to fear, because we have God on our side! Nothing that goes against God’s plan for our lives will succeed.

While these verses read almost like proverbs in that each verse seems to contain a different encouragement for how to live this Christian life, they really are all tied together in love. When we love one another, we will show them hospitality. When we love prisoners, we will care for them and remember them. When we love our spouse, we will honor our marriage. When we love other people, we will not commit any sexually immoral acts with them. When we love God, we will not love money nor the things that it can buy. We need not be afraid of anything in this world, because God loves us and He will protect us.

Live out the love of Christ today by loving others just as God has loved us!

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


Sin 8: False Views of the Cross

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Friday, May 6, 2022 0 comments

by Charlie Wolcott

When we mess around with what sin is and try to take it lightly, the logical conclusion leads to explicitly false views of the cross. Sin IS a gospel issue, and I would argue that it very well should be considered a salvation issue. If we do not understand the severity of sin, what that means, and who we have sinned again, what part of the “essential doctrines” are we actually believing as the Bible actually teaches? Now to be clear, not all those who have fallen for these false teachings actually believe what these false teachings declare; however, we must warn people of these teachings and what path they take. Why? Because whether the person does it or not, someone is going to take the small step of liberalism and go the distance. Paul said a little leaven leavens the whole loaf and today, I am going to showcase what happens when people take sin too lightly.

Around 15 years ago, Keith Getty and Stuart Townend wrote perhaps is one of my favorite modern “hymns”: “In Christ Alone.” I first heard it at an Intervarsity Chapter Camp around 2008 or 2009. There is a line in the second verse that reads: “While on that cross, as Jesus died, the wrath of God was satisfied.” Several churches contacted the Getty and Townend to see if they could change the life from “wrath of God was satisfied” to “the love of God was magnified.” Why would they do this? Because they don’t view God’s wrath as being an actual part of God’s character. Why would they think that? They reject the Bible’s teaching on sin. These are the same people that suggest that John Newton’s line in “Amazing Grace” of “That saved a wretch like me” is misguided. What does this train of thought do? It destroys what the work of the cross was all about, and it is an affront to the character of God. When we take away the seriousness of sin AND God’s holiness, you no longer have the Gospel of Christ; you are only left with a feel-good story.

The Progressive Christians have brought back another false teaching from ages past called universalism. This is the idea that it doesn’t matter what anyone believes, everyone goes to Heaven. The way they go about this is to say that God’s love for ALL of mankind is so great that He sent Jesus to die on the cross, and that would empty Hell. Rob Bell wrote a book called Love Wins in which this is his premise. William Paul Young wrote a fictional book titled The Shack in which this doctrine is taught. I came across a Christian Scientist who believed every path leads to God. All these, whether they directly say it or not, teach that not only is Jesus NOT the only way to the Father (calling Jesus a liar as per John 14:6), but they ALSO admit their own ideology has no weight either. When the Christian Scientists who think that every road leads to God were evangelizing and promoting their events, I wanted to ask them, “Why I should go to this event? If my path gets to God and your path gets to God, why should I change anything I am doing? Why should I go with you?” That is what the post-modernism philosophies have done. They have sought to deny any road of being able to stand on absolute fact, and such a position denies their own position of having any ground to stand on, too. But this nullifies the cross and ultimately denies Jesus of His job and the work He did.

Steven Furtick of Elevation Church got himself into a lot of trouble several years ago when in one of his sermons, he denied the Gospel and assaulted God’s character in the same breath. He proclaimed that the Law did not have enough “leverage” to save people (that never was its intention or purpose), and so in order to save people God had to “break the law” for the sake of love. His example of that was a parent driving over the speed limit to rush an injured child to a hospital. His argument is that you will break the law (of the speed limit) for the sake of love. He failed to see that no one would speed in that situation due to love; it’s rather due to fear. If the parent knew the severity of the wound and what the outcome would be (as God does) there would be no fear and no need to rush. But another problem is that Furtick unintentionally charges God as being a lawbreaker, who breaks His own law, and thus says that God sinned. Furtick holds the Law of God (based on God’s character) as being breakable, and that it really doesn’t matter what we do. God’s love will overcome it all. Again, this is all due to a reduced view of sin, a reduced view of the holiness and righteousness of God, and a too high view of self that “we are too special” for God to send any of us to Hell.

There are some who argue that Jesus only died to give us a moral example of what we should do. This is actually a common false view of the Gospel, that the Gospel is merely Jesus’ moral teachings. So Jesus went to the cross to just give us a visual demonstration of sacrificial love and to fight for causes greater than ourselves? Is that all He did that for? Again, this line of thought comes out of a low view of sin and a low view of the holiness and righteousness of God.

There is another one that keeps showing itself indirectly. It’s the Gnostic teaching that when we have “gained enough knowledge,” we, who were once part of the essence of God, will be rejoined with God and thus become part of the true God, thus becoming gods ourselves. The Gnostics did not teach that sin was rebellion against God, but rather that it was at best a “lack of knowledge,” so we need to pursue knowledge to correct our “sins” rather than need a Savior. Kenneth Copeland appears to believe that if he had enough knowledge, he could have died for ours sins just as Jesus did. Not only does this teaching reduce Jesus to a mere man but elevates man to the “savior” status. Copeland is claiming to be a “Christ” or a “messiah”-type figure. That’s a literal fulfillment of Jesus’ warning against false christs.

We are to have nothing to do with such men and such teachings. Their whole goal is to diminish and change the definition of sin, so that they do not have to be held accountable to the Sovereign God who reigns over all, and so they do not have to depend upon Jesus being their Savior. Any time sin is given this treatment, we have a false teaching on the Gospel, the kinds of false teachings that made Paul so mad he wished any who taught such things to “go to Hell.”

We need to stop taking sin lightly, and we need to stop listening to ANY voice that in any way reduces or marginalizes the nature of sin, the weight of sin, and with that, the price of sin. All such teachings are a direct or indirect assault on Christ and the work of the cross. They may proclaim all the doctrines, but it’s clear from their teachings that said doctrines have no weight, and the only thing we are to do with such people is to rebuke them. Otherwise, have nothing to do with them and give them no place for said doctrines. Next week, we’ll recap what sin really is and what it does.

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.


Levels of Information

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Thursday, May 5, 2022 0 comments

by Steve Risner

"For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb." -Psalm 139:13

We began a discussion on information found in genetic material last week. We determined that “instructions” is probably a more accurate description than simply information. We’re talking about a specific kind of information here—coded instructions for building and maintaining highly complex machines. According to Webster’s Dictionary: “Information: what is conveyed or represented by a particular arrangement or sequence of things or the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (such as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects, (1): a signal or character (as in a communication system or computer) representing data, (2): something (such as a message, experimental data, or a picture) which justifies change in a construct (such as a plan or theory) that represents physical or mental experience or another construct.”

Note that DNA is used here by the dictionary as an example. Yet our evolutionist/atheist friends have no idea what is meant when a creationist refers to “information.” But to my point that a better word to use is instructions, let’s look at the meaning of that word: instructions are detailed information telling how something should be done, operated, or assembled. This is according to the Oxford dictionary. Can we see how this applies to information found in DNA? DNA isn’t the instructions. It’s the storage medium used for these instructions, and it accesses the specific instructions that are needed when they’re needed. The process is mind-blowing.

These instructions are not something that is a natural or materialistic phenomenon. As we discussed briefly last time, we’re not describing information you can gather from nature. We are talking about information that is found in coded form and stored within every living thing we find. It’s detailed coded instructions for doing very specific things. A former East German scientist, J. Peil, writes this concerning how information is not just a physical thing:

“Even the biology based on a materialistic philosophy, which discarded all vitalistic and metaphysical components, did not readily accept the reduction of biology to physics… Information is neither a physical nor a chemical principle like energy and matter, even though the latter are required as carriers.” (You can read all about this topic at this link).

From the above link to the book In the Beginning Was Information, you will also find other well-regarded scientists and mathematicians speaking on what information is and is not. Norbert Wiener, the American mathematician, said decades ago that, “Information is information, neither matter nor energy. Any materialism which disregards this will not survive.”

What does this mean? Simply put, this information or these instructions are not just physical occurrences that just happen. Information like this is something an intelligence must produce. In the case of genetics, there is an intelligent creator of the information and an intelligent recipient that decodes the information and follows the instructions—building and maintaining a living thing. It cannot be stressed enough that information or, more specifically instructions, are not a property of matter, and it cannot be explained through material or natural processes. Like using an alphabet, we can arrange the letters we have assigned specific sounds to and make words that, again, have predetermined meanings. The letters and words are not naturally occurring things we find in nature. They are just markings. But an intelligent agent has decided that certain markings will represent certain sounds and, when arranged properly, will create words that have specifically predetermined meanings.

Claude Shannon was a mathematician who first described information, founding what’s known as Information Theory. His work has been used by many in the field of information to describe what information is and what its use is. But Shannon’s definition of information exclusively concerns the statistical properties of sequences of symbols; meaning is completely ignored. This is a limitation in this original or classical information theory because it doesn’t explain meaning or intent. It follows that this concept of information is unsuitable for evaluating the information content of meaningful sequences of symbols.

By limiting ourselves to just the statistical evaluation of information, we fail to understand or even concede the existence of meaning. When looking at the statistical analysis of a certain bit of information, we are simply looking at how many letters or words made up a sentence, what alphabet is used, and how often are words or letters employed. This has nothing at all to do with the actual meaning of the text. In fact, there could be no meaning of the text using this type of analysis. It could just be a random series of letters and spaces. To put this in terms related to living things and genetics, we would be looking at how many bases were used to make the strand of genetic material, what bases are possible (this is the guanine, cytosine, thymine, and adenine discussed in last week’s post), and how often are they used. It would not help you at all in determining what the section of DNA was used for—what its purpose is. The statistical level of information is the first level and is not very useful in this context.

The next level of information would be syntax. Syntax includes all the properties of the process of setting up the information in question. Here we are concerned with the symbols used and the rules governing how they’re made—which ones are appropriate etc. Again, meaning is not taken into account here. This could be the level of information, however, that mechanisms within the cell are used to deter copy errors when replication is occurring. Perhaps that’s too broad an idea. It’s just a thought.

Here we can discuss the conditions for determining if a code is being employed. There are three things that define a code all are necessary for something to be a code (sometimes there’s a fourth): a unique set of symbols must be used, the symbols must be arranged in an irregular fashion, the symbols must be arranged in a clear structure, at least some symbols must occur repeatedly (this one is often necessary but not always).

As opposed to the “necessary conditions” listed above, there is only one sufficient condition: the code must be able to be decoded meaningfully. Are your wheels turning about how this applies to genetics?

Next, we have the third level of information: semantics. This level does take meaning into account. What do the symbols mean when arranged in specific ways? For something to actually be information, it must have meaning. This is in contrast with Shannon’s idea of information. He believed even noise in a communication was information. In other words, if you were listening to the radio and there was static in the signal, that was information by his definition. In terms of meaning, that is obviously not true. In fact, such noise can corrupt a communication and render it unable to convey information—the meaning is lost. This is why our statements I quoted last time were nonsensical in this conversation. Things like, “Information comes from all over the place.” Or “I have a geology degree and can read information directly from an exposed rock face.” The rock face is not trying to tell anyone anything. Nature is not submitting information to us via some form of communication so we can understand her. We can extract information—gathering it through our senses to educate ourselves about it. But this nothing, literally, like, say, reading an encyclopedia or a newspaper or instructions that came with your new entertainment center.

DNA is a storage medium for this coded information, which is really instructions for developing and maintaining a living thing—a highly complex machine. All suitable ways of expressing meanings are called languages. Information can be transmitted or stored in material media only when a language is available. Genetic information is stored in DNA. What does that mean? It means the genetic code meets the criterion for it being considered first a code but also a language. A language must have an intelligent source. A code even more so must have an intelligent source and an intelligent recipient to decode the information and apply meaning to it. This is what happens within living things (in their cells) all the time. It’s a continuous process of finding the needed instructions stored in the DNA, unzipping the DNA to make RNA, using the specific piece of genetic material to generate a specific number of a specific protein, and zipping it back up and starting the process again somewhere else along the chain.

The next level of information after semantics (meaning) is pragmatics. This essentially means the actions required by the information. Information was defined by Werner Strombach (author of An Introduction to Systematic Philosophy and The Laws of Our Thinking: An Introduction to Logic) as a structure which achieves some result in a receiving system. These concepts are easily applicable and appreciated in how genetic information works inside a cell. DNA is continuously causing different actions to happen at the cellular level which impacts how an organism is functioning. It takes the stored instructions and dictates actions based on a series of 4 different chemicals that are ordered specifically to achieve precise results.

The final level of information, apobetics, implies information has a purpose. This ties in with the previous level of information nicely. The purpose of the information found in the genetics of an organism dictates specific actions occurring at specific times. In short, survival is the purpose. Survival of the individual as well as the survival of the species seems to be equally important aspects here.

I bring this long, wordy description regarding the levels of information up because atheists will frequently say goofy things like I quoted last time about information—it’s all over the place or you can get information from a rock or some such thing. But they are only focusing on Shannon’s description of information which, in the context of genetics and living things, is pointless. There is little similarity between the information one may gather from something in nature—something that is not trying to express that information but is simply just there—and the information housed in genetics that has an intended purpose and a specific plan in mind for the organism. Don’t fall for their silly expressions concerning information and information theory. Shannon had some great thoughts on the idea of information but his book on the topic was written 75 years ago. We’ve learned a great deal since then. The fact that evolutionists want to be stuck in 1940’s ideas on information so they can avoid a real conversation about it says quite a bit, in my opinion.

Much of this information was described by Dr. Werner Gitt in his book, In the Beginning Was Information. I highly recommend it.

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.