by Nathan Buck Kids’ movies sometimes have the most profound moments, and often they are unintentional or accidental in their unmasking of principles and values we really do believe are true, even if we spend a tremendous amount of effort trying to deny them. In the Disney movie Ratatouille, an actual rat named Remy becomes a chef in a human restaurant. He is compelled to cook because of his unique sense of smell and taste, alongside a belief in the slogan spoken by his human idol, Chef Gusteau. Chef Gusteau always said, “Anyone can cook.” Through a bizarre set of circumstances Remy ends up controlling a human being by using his hair like a set of puppet strings, and no one knows the food they find so amazing is actually being designed and prepared by a rat. When the nemesis of the movie – food critic Anton Ego – hears about the food, he makes a visit to critique the food with the intention of writing off the restaurant and deflating the reputation that has begun to build. When Ego arrives there is a brief moment in the movie that is actually quite epic. I am sure it was carefully written and designed for the movie because it is a pivotal moment in the story. But it also reveals a truth we often ignore when it comes to discussing the Bible and truth. When Ego is asked what he would like to order, he says to the waiter, “I am craving, perspective… that is what I think I will have, bring me a plate of well-seasoned… perspective…” (pause) “Fresh out I take it? Then how about this, you provide the food, and I will provide the PERSPECTIVE.” You can watch a clip of this scene here. When we ask questions about morality or truth, we typically ask them and try to resolve them from our perspective. Occasionally, if we are teachable, we may try to see a moral issue from someone else’s perspective. We may even consider that there is truth in any perspective. However, when it comes to absolute truth – we may struggle. Absolute truth by definition is a transcendent truth, that holds true for all people, at all times, in all places. It is immutable, meaning it cannot be undone or disproven – it is absolute, and by its nature it supersedes any other assumptions or opinions. The reason we struggle with absolute truth is because of perspective. Look at Genesis 2:16-17 and 3:1-5. Was God being deceptive and trying to trick Adam and Eve? When God tells them to avoid the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, it is actually from a position of freedom to eat from ANY other tree in the garden. They also can freely choose to eat from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. That tree simply had consequence attached to it. The Hebrew words God used there to describe “the knowledge of good and evil” can be translated as, “the experience of wholeness/wellness, and brokenness/dismantling.” Adam and Eve are given a choice of the fullness of life with God, or to experience the rollercoaster of life apart from God. The situation was clearly defined and explained, but how could Adam understand what “brokenness” was at that point? He had never experienced it. Perhaps that is why God added, “and you will surely die.” But did Adam know what death was? Maybe his experiential gap in understanding is what lead him to explain it so poorly to Eve. When she repeats what God told Adam to the serpent in chapter 3, it sounds very different than what God actually said. Does it seem odd that God would put that choice in front of them? They are only days old and are faced with choices and consequences they have no experience with. How could God expect them to know the “right” thing to do? How could their choice be wrong if they didn’t know what evil and death were? Check back during the week to explore these questions and whether there is absolute truth, and next Saturday for Part II of this post.
by Bill Seng “Give thanks to the LORD, for he is good. His love endures forever.” ~Psalm 136:1 If God is good, why does evil persist? If God created all things, where did evil come from? Theologians and skeptics alike ponder these questions. The theologian searches Scripture and philosophy to understand how evil can originate in a good universe. The skeptic will often dismiss the possibility that a “good” God exists. Is the skeptic right to do so, or is there something mysterious about the existence of evil? Is it possible that understanding where evil came from would help us to understand a little more about ourselves, and even God himself? According to the creation account, mankind had no knowledge of good and evil. It was not until they sinned against God that they acquired this knowledge (Genesis 3:4-7). Without knowledge, I think it can be safely said there can be no choice in one’s actions. Having been created good and not having the knowledge of evil, Adam and Eve would not have known how to kill, steal, lie, or covet. Their lack of knowledge of those activities eliminated them as options from their daily lives. Knowledge of good and evil ultimately originates with God. God is the ultimate standard. Everything he created was to reflect his glory and character (Colossians 1:16, Romans 1:20). The difficulty with this issue is that we know that God was not responsible for sin. In fact, he cannot be responsible for sin. Sin is something that is contrary to God’s nature, and God cannot act outside of his nature. So he cannot sin, cause people to sin, or tempt people to sin (James 1:13). If this is true, where did sin come from? We now look to the angels who are, by nature, ministering spirits (Hebrews 1:14). They have always possessed the knowledge of good and evil, which is implied by their role as ministers. In order to minister, one must be able to discern between good and evil. Granted, this creates more questions, but for now let us stick to what we know. Satan is the angel who made sin possible for mankind. He admired his own beauty and became obsessed with his own splendor. As a result he rebelled against God. Although Adam and Eve are held responsible for bringing sin into the world, it probably would not have happened had it not been for Satan’s involvement. Nonetheless, it was mankind’s free will that allowed Adam and Eve the opportunity to sin. The angels also, apparently, possessed free will but had the knowledge of good and evil as well. Such responsibility proved too much for some of the angels, seeing how Satan was not the only angel to fall away from God. It is ironic to think that the knowledge of good and evil is what led to sin, was granted as a result of sin, and is also instrumental in repentance from sin. There is much more to this topic than what I can cover in such a small space. Let it suffice that the “problem of evil” is really not a problem from a truly Biblical perspective. It is clear that God was not responsible for sin and that it was the abuse of the knowledge of good and evil that led to sin. Once again, despite the wickedness of the first sin, God made a way for the first sin to also lead to repentance.
by Nathan Buck “What will people think?” How many times a week do you ask that question of yourself or say it out loud to your family, friends, children, etc? Should we even be asking that question at all? We have all felt the tendrils of fear mixed with stomach acid churning that comes when we know someone is mad at us, or we are about to face confrontation. Sometimes we have had it suddenly crash upon us and overwhelm us, when someone takes an unexpected opportunity to lob a grenade of years of frustration or offenses that they have stored up against us. It can be paralyzing to us. No matter how much we try to realize they may have been having a bad day, or may not have even meant half of what they just said, the truth of the matter is that we care and are impacted by every word they spoke. How do we avoid being held hostage by what others think of us? How do we be humble ourselves and care for others, without being captive to anytime they disagree or choose to be offended by a choice or comment we make? Take a moment to read Matthew 10:16-33. See what Jesus did there? He sent his followers out to share God’s love and grace, to heal the sick, to cast out demons, etc. They are on a great mission, and they should expect everyone to just embrace them right? Not according to what Jesus says next. Apparently, Jesus realizes that when people begin to live the truth and demonstrate God’s love, it will impact and dismantle the carefully created illusions, myths, lies, and personal protections that people create for themselves. Some do it for profit, some do it for a sense personal safety/security, and others are simply deceived by untruths and a captive to shame, lust, etc. And when truth enters those places, imprisoned people may be set free, but profitable or safe feeling people are suddenly uneasy. Jesus knows that people will attack, argue, or belittle one another for all kinds of reasons. Where does he leave His disciples’ focus? What does He share with them to help them realize where their real concern should be? Look at verses 26-33. Jesus changes the focus and the meaning of the word “fear” from a people based fear that tries to avoid conflict or threats, to a God based fear that is about awe, reverence, respect, and understanding that HE alone is the one who can do the most harm or the most good to any living creature. Notice how Jesus caps that refocusing. Instead of leaving with “fear God,” like we should cower and run and hide from his power cause he might fry us with a lightning bolt and destroy our soul, He leaves it with an expression of God’s compassion. He reminds them that God knows them and cares about even the hairs on their heads (if you are bald, God still cares about you). Jesus finishes the thought with a play on the word “fear.” He remind his followers that they should not be “afraid” (terror or alarm) of people or any circumstance because God loves them, by re-using the same word “fear” in a different context. The first context when he talks about fearing God it is about worship and reverence, and the second – when he tells them not to be afraid – is about being scared or terrified. Let that thought sink in for a moment. You don’t need to be afraid of what people think, because God’s opinion of you and His care for you matters more than any earthly relationship. Now that doesn’t mean you ignore negative feedback from people – because you may have legitimately acted like a jerk, or mistakenly said a hurtful thing. And it is good to check your motives and learn from when others point out your mistakes. If you are a follower of Jesus, you should be mature or maturing to be able to take negative feedback or confrontation from others and grow with it. You should also never let someone’s opinion or offense toward you define your worth, direction, or decisions – those are reserved only for God. Check out the other blogs coming this week as they continue to discussion on “fear of people.”