data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11e1e/11e1e9ea3d0524dad0fb560d2f34f30e7c1645ca" alt="by Michael Homula"
by Michael Homula While I do not recommend the movie Gettysburg for historical accuracy (it is fraught with issues and based on historical fiction – the novel Killer Angels) it is a very low barrier and fairly entertaining entry point to start a learning journey about Gettysburg provided it is followed by some effort to discern the facts from the myth. In the movie, Robert E. Lee (played by Martin Sheen), is repeatedly heard saying, “It’s all in God’s hands.” While there is no firsthand account or eye/ear witness who heard Lee speak these words at Gettysburg, it is historically accurate based on the writings and other words spoken by Lee in his lifetime and during the Civil War. In studying Robert E. Lee for over 20 years, it has become crystal clear to me that Robert E. Lee was a devoted follower and humble servant of Jesus Christ. The teachings of Christ and the words of the Bible shine brightly in his walk and life. Lee was a man of prayer and devotion and his life, words and personal writings demonstrate his profound faith. General Lee was a saved, born-again, Christian man and everyone knew and respected him for it. He wrote to his chaplains who informed him of their prayers for him that he thanked them and needed all of the prayers they could offer in his behalf. And then he said: “I can only say that I am nothing but a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation.” (Titus 3:5; Eph. 2:8-9; John 3:7) Given his role as the commanding General of the Army of Northern Virginia, and the reverence and esteem his officers and men held for him, it would have been easy – and perhaps understandable – if Lee would have been filled with self-pride and view that he was in control of circumstances, events, and outcomes. But this was not the case. Lee believed everything was God’s will and all of the evidence shows Lee possessed a granite like conviction of trusting God’s will implicitly. At Gettysburg, on the afternoon of July 3, 1863, the day had turned hot and humid. At his headquarters just west of town, alongside the Chambersburg Pike, Gen. Robert E. Lee was feeling a heat that had little to do with the sun. Everywhere he looked men, animals, and weapons were moving with a sense of purpose instilled by orders he had given just a short time before. A climax to two days of battle was coming, announced by an action sure to be bloody, and certain, he fervently hoped it would be decisive and victorious. The now famous Pickett’s charge was imminent. To anyone passing by his modest headquarters tent, the 56-year-old General Lee appeared, as one soldier recalled, “calm and serene.” There is no reason to believe otherwise. “I think and work with all my power to bring the troops to the right place at the right time; then I have done my duty,” Lee said. “As soon as I order them into battle, I leave my army in the hands of God.” That day did not turn out well for Lee, his Army of Northern Virginia, and the Confederacy. In perhaps his finest moment, after his men had been repulsed convincingly, he rode out amongst his retreating men and blamed himself for the failure saying, “It is all my fault – I asked more of men than should have been asked of them.” But Lee had trusted God. He committed himself, his men, and his army into the providence of God’s will. Yet, the outcome was not what he had hoped for. For Lee, God’s will had been done in the repulse of his men. Dr. Charles Stanley said, “Be obedient and leave the consequences to God.” This is what Lee did and it is a valuable lesson for us today. Go ahead and apply it to any circumstance you’re facing. Trouble in a relationship? Making a decision about money? Need to trust God with a health issue? Be obedient and leave the consequences to God. Stands up, doesn’t it? Lee’s attitude and behavior were a result of his faith in God and it reminds me of an amazing true story from the Bible. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego also lived out their implicit faith and trust in God’s will as we read in Daniel 3. At the edge of a fiery furnace, they had a decision. Bow to an idol or be thrown in a furnace. They chose faith, believing that God would deliver them from the very fire that tested it. But then they said, “But even if He doesn’t.” (Daniel 3:18) They didn’t jump into the fire knowing they’d be delivered. They jumped knowing The Deliverer. I’m shaking my head as I type this sentence. I want an “Even if He doesn’t” kind of faith. Save me, help me, heal me. But even if He doesn’t… I am confident, though I don’t know with any fact based evidence, that this part of Daniel 3:18 had taken up residence in the heart of Robert E. Lee at Gettysburg. “It’s all in God’s hand” he firmly believed as he committed his army to that fateful charge. He also firmly believed God would deliver him and his men a victory. But it is plainly evident that he also had the faith of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. “But even if He doesn’t…” Lee would continue to trust in God and His perfect, good, and pleasing will. Do you have an “Even if He doesn’t” kind of faith? For more reading on Lee’s faith, please check out “Christ in the Camp: or, Religion in Lee’s Army,” by Chaplain J. William Jones, known as the “Fightin Parson,” who knew Lee personally.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ca4/77ca413d882fb6c73ab3f84c4427ecc463cc1116" alt="by Charlie Wolcott"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b60f9/b60f9f42a72e58f535ab8ae91ff02ccee5c456be" alt="by Steve Risner"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad97b/ad97bf44e2df3c81c05e0215001826f7aa736243" alt="by Logan Ames"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/666b9/666b935ef2805710b55fedf5f2ec9893a629b7d3" alt="by Bill Seng"
by Bill Seng “How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they preach unless they are sent?” (Romans 10:14-15a) There are many people who struggle with the concept of a ministry that focuses on worldview. Certain well-meaning Christians might think such a ministry is redundant. They might ask why we preach worldview when we could just be evangelists. They might also wonder why we spend time trying to convince people of what the Bible says when we could just hold them up in prayer, that they would one day believe. I would answer that the teaching of worldview is evangelism, but even more than just evangelism. I would also agree that such a ministry should not be practiced without holding those up in prayer to whom we minister. The teaching of worldview in a public forum is, indeed, a form of evangelism. I can’t help but to notice that throughout the New Testament there are many debates. You will notice such debates taking place on the Worldview Warriors webpage as well as on Facebook. I have also noticed that in the New Testament, the debates almost never, if ever, result in the conversion of one debater or the other. You might also conclude such from our debates. However, in both cases, those who listen in are the ones who are seeking the truth. It is they who measure the debate and determine who it is they find most convincing. Worldview ministry is intended to open minds toward the possibility of the truth of the Gospel and the Scriptures. Another observation I have made is that nobody receives the Gospel unless he or she is open to the possibility that it is true. And why would you receive it if you did not believe it is true? Our country faces a predicament of extreme secularization that is about to leave us in shambles. Young people are taught from the earliest stages of their education to view the world as though there is no God. This has also been a problem within the Church. Recently, I finished a book by Francis Chan titled Multiply. This book was in response to the growing need for making disciples inside the Church. I found it fascinating that the first few chapters were devoted to explaining why discipleship is necessary and the whole rest of the book is devoted to teaching the reader about Scripture as though it is the authoritative, inspired, and infallible Word of God. My friends, this is worldview ministry. And what I take from the layout of Chan’s book is that you cannot be a true disciple of Christ unless you are indoctrinated (yes, indoctrination is not always a bad word) into a Biblical worldview. So I have proposed that worldview can be used both with evangelistic and disciple-making intents. Is it any wonder that the ministry of Worldview Warriors is passionate about what it teaches? We seek to tear down strongholds, build up leaders, and equip everyone with knowledge that will aid you in godly living. Don’t let the nay-sayers discourage you. Instead, take off the veil of spiritual blindness and let your mind be transformed so that God’s work will transform you from the inside out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88108/8810895a9a2f58135d17706d37c81b446030025c" alt="by Katie Erickson"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ca4/77ca413d882fb6c73ab3f84c4427ecc463cc1116" alt="by Charlie Wolcott"
1) You shall have no other gods before me.
2) You shall not make yourself any idols. Today, we don’t live in a world where a society will make an image of a deity and bow before it and worship it. Or do we? We don’t have a daily ritual where we go to a temple and bow before an image that we can see and give it our praise and worship? Or do we? We don’t give honor and praise to a person or object or idea that should only be given to God Almighty. Or do we? Idolatry was a major issue throughout the Old Testament history. An idol is any object, person, spirit, idea, or image that is placed in a higher level of honor than God. Some of the major idols mentions are a Golden Calf (Exodus 32), Baal (1 Kings 18), Asherah (Judges 6), and Molech (Leviticus 20). What did these idols mean or represent? The Golden Calf was created in rebellion against Moses when he was on the mountain of God too long for the people’s patience. The people were displeased with Moses’ leadership and they crafted an idol in the image of what they had seen in Egypt. It was a longing for the imprisoned past they had where they had grown comfortable. Baal was the god of the rain. Israel is a desert climate and was an agricultural culture. They depended upon the annual rain for their crops and their livelihood. Elijah directly challenged the authority of Baal by declaring that it would not rain until Elijah gave his word. He finally brought the prophets of Baal into a showdown at Mt. Carmel where they called upon their god for fire. Elijah prayed to the one true God and fire came down. Asherah was a goddess of love and fertility. For women, barrenness was considered a curse, and as a result often an outcast from society. As a result, they would turn to whatever it took to support being able to have children. And usually that led to Asherah worship. Asherah worship led to a lot of immoral sexual debauchery. Molech worship was particularly evil. In attempt to avoid curses and to be blessed, parents would do the unthinkable: sacrifice an infant child to Molech by placing the child on a metal plate and putting the plate with the child on it into a fire. We see very similar behavior today. It takes a very different form, but it is the same mentality. We don’t worship statutes like Israel did but we do worship people. We do worship idols in a different form. American celebrities are certainly idols. When John Lennon of the Beatles was killed, all of America mourned like it was the end of the world. Just last week, Robin Williams committed suicide. How much media attention was he given? Miley Cyrus has been an idol for a long time, first as Hannah Montana and now she is synonymous with one word: twerking. What about sports figures? How many of us search out every detail about our favorite sports players or teams? What about the big name preachers out there? Yes, there are the Benny Hinn’s, the Joel Osteens, etc. There are the Mark Driscoll’s, the Rick Warrens, etc. My favorite one is Eric Ludy. But I have to caution myself to not idolize him. Paul Washer has an awesome 15-minute interview addressing how we as Christians can idolize preachers, some of whom are very solid. While we may respect and admire some of these people, we must be careful that they do not take the place of God. Each of these role models we look up to are fallible men and women and they all have a need for a Savior just like us. There is a place for these types of people, for the public role models, but they cannot fill the shoes that only God can fill. Let us get a little deeper and personal. I often hear people say, “An idol is anything that takes the place of God.” There is a lot of truth in this. But we have to be careful. God desires a relationship with us, but he does not call us to neglect the duties we have committed to. At an Intervarsity Camp I went to a few years ago, the speaker talked about how he was on a mission trip and he was supposed to go out and play with the kids. He did not want to do that so he created an excuse: I’m going to have my quiet time. It sounded very solid and well-intentioned but he was clear that his motive was wrong. We learn in 1 Samuel 15 that to obey is better than sacrifice. Is it possible that we can make our “quiet time” an idol”? Yes, it is. What else can be idols? Our jobs. Do we neglect our families, our home duties, for the sake of our job? What about relationships? Do we hold our significant other so high that we are willing to cut off relationships with family to hold onto it? What about parents or our children? Can we trust God to take care of them or do we have to control every aspect of their lives? Will you sin against another - a friend, a spouse, or even a stranger - for the sake of “family honor”? What about social media? A very big clue that our cell phones or our Facebook accounts are an addiction, an idol, is what happens when we are separated from them. Can you walk away from your cell phone and not think about it? Can you step away from Facebook or Instagram or Twitter? If you do, how long does it take for you to be dreaming or wondering what is going on there? And here is the kicker that a friend of mine told me about: Are you willing to sin, against God or against someone else, to maintain that job, relationship, object, etc? If so, then you have an idol. Now, do not read what I am not saying. I am not telling you to abstain from all these things - from having a role model, from having a relationship with someone, from having a favorite sports team, from having social media, from listening to a popular pastor. I am not telling to stay away from these things. Many of them are good things in and of themselves. I am simply saying they need to be put in their proper place. We need to not look to them for the satisfaction, comfort, approval, and support that only God is able to provide. Remember, God is on the throne, not us, not the things we like. Keep him on the throne and he will let you know where to place all these other things in our lives. Go read more from Worldview Warriors on idolatry in this post or this post.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad97b/ad97bf44e2df3c81c05e0215001826f7aa736243" alt="by Logan Ames"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/666b9/666b935ef2805710b55fedf5f2ec9893a629b7d3" alt="by Bill Seng"
by Bill Seng Take offence if you will, when people claim that God is cruel for causing natural disasters to take place in certain areas of the world as a form of divine judgment. I remember when Hurricane Katrina took place in New Orleans. Many in the fundamentalist-evangelical community (I’m referring to folks like Pat Robertson) were likening New Orleans to Sodom and Gomorrah, pointing out its lavish Mardi Gras celebrations, gay pride, and acceptance of voodoo as a legitimate religion. The conclusion was that they deserved it and God used Katrina as a form of judgment. Whether this was true or not, people were offended at the idea that God judged New Orleans with a hurricane. What I find ironic is that the humanistic environmental movement is trying to shift the blame and the guilt away from God and onto the shoulders of humankind. It used to be widely accepted that God was responsible for the weather: rain, sunshine, catastrophes, and wonders. Now the “consensus” is that humans are responsible for tomorrow’s forecast. Yup, that’s right! No need to factor in the variables of natural cycles, geography, or cosmic factors. You can know and determine the forecast of tomorrow simply by being aware of what you do on a daily basis. To be clear, I am referring to the idea of global warming, global climate change, global climate disruption, or whatever name must be given to it tomorrow because of its general failure as a viable scientific theory. Let me backtrack a little on what I have said. “Global warming” was occurring until approximately 15 or so years ago but has been absent ever since. The man-made aspect, as a theory, has fallen flat on its face as populations continue to increase, corporations continue drilling for oil, and carbon emissions continue to be released into the atmosphere. If you are going to check out any additional links, check out this one! http://www.ijreview.com/2014/04/128985-33-stories/ Because of the lack of warming, the label has evolved into “change.” Because of the lack of change, it has evolved into “disruption.” What does disruption mean? Answer: Man-made natural disasters like hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, etc. It is impossible to deny that these disasters occur, but should we attribute their occurrences to the negligence of mankind toward nature? If so, can it truly be proven that mankind is responsible? So long as hurricanes and such continue to happen, I think that certain opportunists don’t care. Why is it called “climate disruption?”: http://www.scientific-alliance.org/scientific-alliance-newsletter/global-warming-global-climate-disruption Now I conceded that warming had occurred over a decade ago. Why then do I deny global warming as a reality? First, because global warming normally refers to man-made global warming. That is not to say that I believe that human activity does not affect climates at all, but that the effects of human activity are greatly exaggerated. Take, for instance, Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth. His predictions in 2006 don’t even come close to the reality in 2014. His estimates would have put entire coastal cities underwater at catastrophic depths. The Final Countdown: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2006/01/27/algore_we_have_ten_years_left_before_earth_cooks I don’t know all of the details, but have heard from several credible sources that are critical of global warming that concede carbon emissions play some sort of a role in warming, but it is so tiny that it is almost unnoticeable. There is significantly more information that proves man-made warming is not a threat, but let me use this to transition into my next point. Secondly, past warming trends correlated almost perfectly with increased solar activity. Once the solar activity returned to what we perceive as normal, warming stopped. Coincidence? Michael Oard (2 parts of one of his lectures. He addresses the sun’s effect on climate in part 2):
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BttFVgMLkac
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv1MOPlO26U Warning: THESE SCIENTISTS DO NOT EXIST (Actually they do, but you didn’t hear it from me):
http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/features/global-warming I understand that supposedly (and I don’t use that word loosely) the majority of the scientific community believes in global warming. The reason I emphasize supposedly is because this word and the statistics behind the majority claim require a lot of unpacking. I’m not going to do that right now. Instead of doing so, I will give you my conclusion as a result of the proverbial unpacking. If you accept global warming/change/disruption at this stage in history, you are denying reality. Frozen Great Lakes: http://www.foxnews.com/weather/2014/05/07/summer-2014-cool-season-for-central-eastern-canada-dry-in-west/
Ship searching for melting ice trapped in ice: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/08/22222323-trapped-research-ship-rescue-vessel-break-free-of-antarctic-ice?lite The perfect example regarding such denial is none other than the Reverend Al Sharpton. During his show on CNN, he mocked global warming skeptics as being right-wing looneys who deny global warming just because it is cold during the winter. Tell me, Mr. Sharpton, or anybody else who is critical of the so-called global warming deniers, if a cold winter is not evidence that global warming is not happening what is? I thought global warming meant warmer climates, and global climate change means that the trend of climate has totally shifted. A cold winter is normal… that is our point. So is a warm spring and summer. It is not difficult to figure out. To the global warming advocates, if it’s too hot, its global warming. If it’s too cold, its global climate change. Mind you, Sharpton mocks global warming deniers while playing footage of America being leveled by snow! How do you reason with such a mind? Check out Sharpton’s rant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_hp6bO0IzQ
An interesting article regarding this past winter: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/report-global-warming-earth-cold/2014/05/08/id/570380/ The scientific community, to me, is like the Roman Catholic Church in the days of Martin Luther (no offence to my Catholic friends). For such and such a fee, we can absolve you of such and such a sin. Can anyone say “carbon tax”? Standing against such lies results in ridicule and in some cases punishment. Indoctrination is a dangerous, dangerous tool in the hands of the corrupt. Humanism has adopted environmental causes to forward tis agenda and religion. But instead of blaming the world’s injustice on a God they don’t believe in, they blame you and me. And they will ridicule us until we finally conform to their will. So the question is no longer “How can a loving God be so cruel?” It has now become, “How can you be so thoughtless when you can clearly see that you are causing droughts, famines, hurricanes, and other natural disasters throughout the world? How dare you drive that SUV!” Of course, this question/accusation is not genuine. It is meant to manipulate the masses. That is why verifiable scientific data is never presented. The loyal global warming supporters always fall back on the fact that 95%+ of their faithful priests (that we call scientists) believe in global warming and that’s good enough for them. In some form or another, God is in control of the weather and the climate. Does he use it for divine judgment? Sometimes “yes,” sometimes “no.” But I am to be the judge of neither circumstance. All I have to say is that next time you hear about a hurricane, tornado, or any other form of natural disaster, don’t look at me. I didn’t do it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88108/8810895a9a2f58135d17706d37c81b446030025c" alt="by Katie Erickson"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11e1e/11e1e9ea3d0524dad0fb560d2f34f30e7c1645ca" alt="by Michael Homula"
by Michael Homula I am going to deviate from sharing a specific story about Gettysburg today. Rather, I want to use a scenario that played out thousands of times at Gettysburg, and thousands more across the battlefields of the Civil War, to illustrate a point about faith. I have been studying the Battle of Gettysburg since I was 15 years old, long before I came to saving faith in Jesus Christ in August of 2003. I recall walking the field when I was in college and wondering what would pass through the heart and mind of a man who, being mortally wounded, was facing certain death. While death came instantly for some, most would experience mind boggling pain and suffering from horrific wounds before succumbing to death. Certain types of wounds in the Civil War were almost always fatal and the men knew it. Surviving images of the dead on the battlefield at Gettysburg or any other Civil War battlefield reveals corpses whose jackets and shirts are ripped open at the chest or stomach. This was not the result of post death pillaging of the wounding but the work of the dying men themselves. They knew if they were gut shot they would die so, immediately after being wounded, they would tear open their jackets and shirts to see where they were hit. If it was in the abdomen or chest they knew they were most likely going to die and would prepare by writing last words in diaries, muttering final words for comrades in arms to share with their soon-to-be widows and families, and some would even finally come to faith in Jesus. A term that we now know as foxhole faith – though there were really no foxholes in the Civil War. Confederate dead at the Rose Farm - Gettysburg, PA Foxhole faith refers to someone whose life is ebbing away and in desperation they cry out to God to save them. In the face of battle and death, men who have had nothing to do with God suddenly find themselves facing bullets flying past their head or experiencing mortal wounds and they cry out to God to save them. “If you get me out of here alive, I’ll serve you, God,” might be something they’d pray in the face of death – if they are even given the time to cry out before dying. If they survive, this type of commitment rarely ever lasts beyond the rescue. If the person is spared from death and returns to safety, the promises fade and life without God eventually returns. In Isaiah 17:7-8 we learn about another type of foxhole faith: In that day people will look to their Maker and turn their eyes to the Holy One of Israel. They will not look to the altars, the work of their hands and they will have no regard for the Asherah poles and the incense altars their fingers have made. Isaiah is bringing a message from God to the people of Damascas. After the ruin of that city, there will only be a few of them left, “like the stray olives left on the tree after harvest” (Isaiah 24:13). These few remaining will realize the vanity of idol worship they’ve been participating in, and they will suddenly turn to their Creator. They will suddenly have respect for God. This reminds me of that famous passage found in Philippians 2: “…and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Clearly this kind of faith is not focused on God. It is focused on self. This kind of foxhole faith is actually idolatry itself because it’s about putting God on a shelf until you need Him. True faith trusts God in the good times and the bad. How’s your faith today? Are you able to honor God in the good times, or are you like these people from Damascas, or those facing death on the battlefield, who turn to their own pleasure and carnal pursuits until crisis hits? The problem with the latter of these two is that there is no guarantee of time to make one last confessions, one last moment of repentance or one last moment to finally trust Jesus alone for salvation. James writes, “Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes” (James 4:14). If you do not have the eternal security found only in Jesus Christ, there should be a sense of urgency because this life can be over in the blink of an eye. You may not have time to pull open your jacket and shirt and do a gut check, finally confessing Jesus as Lord and Savior at the last possible moment. The encouragement today is to trust Him. Have faith that God has and will rescue you now and forever from death if only you will trust in Jesus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a04e7/a04e74576feca7b09878176372b00c2be9a88875" alt="by Nathan Buck"
by Nathan Buck When I was recruiting to help staff a telecom company, they would interview with an age-old sales question. They would put a pen on the table in front of a candidate and ask them to, “Sell me the pen.” The candidate would then struggle on the spot to come up with ideas of how to demonstrate their best sales skills, in relationship to making this hiring manager want to buy this pen. I will never forget one candidate who picked up the pen, thought for a moment, and then proceeded to describe the pen to the managers as if it were a woman. He described its curves, it exterior features, and its ability to smoothly communicate whatever needed to be said. After completely exhausting the analogy and almost losing the Hiring Manager to hysterical laughter over a very straight and very simple Bic Stic type pen, the interview was over. The candidate did not get the job, but I certainly admire his creativity. In our relationship with God, prayer is often overcomplicated (or oversimplified) depending on how you look at it – by having a similar “sales” like attitude. We start to think of prayer kind of like that interview, where we have to “sell” God on why our request is important and why He should respond. All the while, we miss the fact that we have painted ourselves into a corner. When prayer is just a transaction, then we expect to put in something and get something out. We put in creative words and petitions, or try really authentic begging and justifying, and expect that if we do that well enough, we will get what we want from God. The next few weeks, some of the Worldview Warriors bloggers are going to be writing about prayer. I encourage you to read these posts and explore the topics from each writer’s perspective this month. In the meantime, read Psalm 1 and ask yourself how the pictures in that Psalm change your thoughts about what prayer does. And read Romans 12:1-2 – consider if prayer is an act of worship, and if it is, how do these two simple verses change your view of what prayer is?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ca4/77ca413d882fb6c73ab3f84c4427ecc463cc1116" alt="by Charlie Wolcott"
Sabbath - Genesis 2:2-3
Man's Dominion over Creation - Genesis 1:28
Man Made in God's Image - Genesis 1:26-27
The Trinity - Genesis 1:26
A Perfect Creation - Genesis 1:31
Marriage - Genesis 1:26-27; 2:24
Work - Genesis 2:15
Choice to Worship God - Genesis 2:17
Sin - Genesis 3
Death - Genesis 2:17; 3:17; 3:22
Clothing - Genesis 3:7; 3:21
Blood as payment for Sin - Genesis 3:21
The Promise of a Savior - Genesis 3:15
Marriage Roles - Genesis 3:16
Toil, Thorns, Cursed Creation - Genesis 3:17-19
Animal Sacrifice - Genesis 3:21; 4:3-4
Worldwide Judgment of Sin - Genesis 6-8
Baptism - Genesis 6-8
Rainbow Promise - Genesis 9:13-15
One Human Race - Genesis 5,10,11
Call to the Promised Land - Genesis 12:1
Promise of Israel - Genesis 12:2
Blessing/Curses on Israel - Genesis 12:3
Jesus of the Order of Melchizedek - Genesis 14:18
Tithing - Genesis 14:20
Circumcision - Genesis 17:11
Intercession - Genesis 18:23-33
Jesus, the Willing/Final Sacrifice - Genesis 22
Firstborn/Birthright - Genesis 21; 25:31-34; 27
Dreams/Visions - Genesis 37; 40; 41
God works ALL things for the good of those who Love him, called to his purpose - Genesis 37;39; 41 This list is anything but comprehensive. This is just 32 doctrines and teachings that have a direct reference in Genesis. And notice that in this list, 2/3 of this list is found and rooted in Genesis 1-11, the chapters of debate on origins. Now I understand that if I had made a comprehensive list, this fraction could change. I’ve been writing about the Old Earth and Young Earth origin models and why this issue is important for Christians. I hear that many simply choose to avoid this discussion entirely as to not bring up the conflict. However, this list shows that the majority of Christian doctrine has its roots in the first 11 chapters of Genesis. If these chapters are to be ignored or gotten wrong, how much more does that affect our understanding of the “important” parts, like the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus? I have heard many people, especially from the Old Earth camp, say that it is difficult to understand Genesis. They often reference the many different ways that “day” can be interpreted or how we cannot be so certain that Genesis is a historical account because it “could be” poetry or metaphorical. But I have this question for them. If they have such a hard time understanding the foundations, how could they understand the Gospel? Jesus said the same thing when speaking to Nicodemus. He asked “If I tell you of earthy things and you do not believe, how can you believe me if I tell you about heavenly things?” If we can’t grasp or if we can’t believe Genesis, how can we honestly say we understand the Gospel? If we don’t understand how sin and death entered the world, if we believe Christ, what are we being saved from? If Genesis is a myth, how real is our salvation? What is more, Revelation 21 and 22 are a mirror image of Genesis 1-2. It shows us that what we started with in Genesis is a shadow, a picture of what the New Earth will be like. If our origins model is filled with death and decay, how can we believe that the New Earth will be any different? I will say that one’s position on origins does not determine one’s salvation. That is dependent upon faith and dependence on Christ as LORD (not merely Savior, but Lord). But I find often that one’s position on origins tends to be a fruit of their actual position with Christ. And when I see pastors and preachers proclaim an Old Earth origins model, I am forced to question what else they get wrong. I believe Young Earth Creation because it is the only origins position that gets all these doctrines’ foundations right. The Old Earth models only get it right starting with Genesis 12, but there is a logical break between their position on Genesis 1-11 and on Genesis 12-on. YEC is by far the most consistent origins model with Scripture. It is completely consistent with the historical records of all the other nations. All observational science is not in conflict with the YEC account. Finally, before I ever heard about the sciences that back up Scripture, I believed what YEC has preached. Since I was a child and I read Genesis, I believed that God made the universe in six days and I believed that the creation account was very recent. I didn’t know it was 6000 years but I knew right away it wasn’t millions of years. I had heard of Evolution growing up but it never made any sense to me. And as I took my science classes in college it still never made any sense to me. I understood how it is supposed to work and the ideas behind it, but I have never been able to see how it works with the scientific principles it claims to be based on. I’ve had many people try to explain it but it was just a repeat of what the textbooks say. But when I heard about the science from the YEC groups, it made sense. Perfect? No. But it showed that what the Bible has claimed for thousands of years has been verified. And it has been time and time again. I do hope this series on origins has challenged you to think about where you come from and why you believe that. Whether you believe it or not, it affects how you live your life today, what decisions you make, and helps you focus on where you are going. And ultimately, talking about origins does not mean much if we do not intend to bring it to Christ. He is the center of it all. He is the Creator and he is the Savior. If you trust Christ with your life, you should also trust him in how he made you and this universe. If you trust him on how he made everything, you can trust him with your life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad97b/ad97bf44e2df3c81c05e0215001826f7aa736243" alt="by Logan Ames"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4b55/d4b55f593366931698048855d28ada576a6ff967" alt="by Daniel Fazzina"
by Daniel Fazzina The Bible contains incredible stories of miracles and divine interventions. Moses parted the sea. Peter healed a man lame from his mother’s womb. Jesus walked on water, drove demons out of people and raised others from the dead. But are these types of events still happening today? Some people say the age of miracles has ended, but I beg to differ. Being a curious journalist, I frequently ask people I meet, “Have you ever witnessed or experienced a miracle or a divine intervention?” Nearly everyone I ask has a story about something that happened to them that defied natural explanation, something they consider miraculous. It could be a near-death experience, a close call where should’ve been killed, a dramatic healing, or an answered prayer that gave them the help they needed at just the right time. Some people’s entire lives seem to be one long sequence of divine interventions and miracles. Yet for others, these types of occurrences seem to be totally outside their experience. I wonder why that is. Maybe they don’t recognize a miracle when they see one? Maybe they just haven’t experienced one yet, but their time will come? Whatever the reason, for some people divine interventions are outside their world altogether. When I asked one friend if he’d ever experienced a miracle, he responded that he never had—and even questioned the very existence of miracles. “After all,” he reasoned, “if the miracles like the ones in the Bible are true, they’d still be happening today. How come I’ve never seen one?” A fair question, undoubtedly. It was this line of reasoning that became the very purpose that I started my radio program, Divine Intervention, on which I interview intriguing people who’ve experienced God’s hand in amazing ways. You see, in my experience, miracles and divine interventions like those recorded in the Bible are still happening—today! People just need to know about them. During the short time I’ve walked this planet, I’ve been blessed to meet some very interesting people who have powerful miracle testimonies. I don’t believe these meetings were coincidences or chance encounters, but rather divine appointments. I don’t think it a coincidence, for example, that I’ve met three people who’ve been shot in the head and lived to tell about it. Nor do I think it accidental that I know three people who miraculously recovered from a coma and paralysis after doctors said they should be dead or, at best, vegetables. I don’t chalk up to serendipity the fact that a good friend and college classmate, who was born a paraplegic, miraculously got up out of his wheelchair and walked for the first time at age seven after having been prayed for in the name of Jesus. I’ve experienced God’s intervention in my own life many times, including two dramatic healings—one from a painful, chronic back condition and one from a grapefruit-sized cancerous tumor that threatened my life. I’ve met people who’ve experienced God’s intervention in all types of ways—not just through healings. In fact, these experiences seem to be common in the lives of many who are sincere followers of Christ, no matter what denomination they are affiliated with. Their stories inspire hope and faith and need to be told. They are a testament to the fact that Jesus is alive and still working among us every day – and sometimes using miracles. I’m continually awed by the incredibly passionate, and generous people God has sent my way. They’ve been selfless, transparent, and vulnerable, and in many cases have bared their souls with the single goal of encouraging a broken, hurting world in need of hope to have faith in the Lord Jesus Christ—Immanuel, “God with us.” If you don’t believe in God or have never experienced a miracle or a divine intervention, it’s my prayer that you will call on the name of Jesus, the miracle maker, and that He will begin to show you some of the many ways that God does intervene in people’s lives daily. The age of miracles is not over, my friend. Open wide your eyes, heart, and mind, and prepare to experience the miraculous! About Daniel Fazzina: Mr. Fazzina’s professional background is in media production. His experience includes hosting radio shows, editing music videos, directing a short film, and award-winning commercials. He also served as a board member of St. John’s University’s chapter of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, where he earned his B.S. in Communication Arts in 1998. After studying in Spain, Italy, and France, and doing missionary work in the Dominican Republic, he has gained a broadened appreciation for different peoples, languages, and cultures. His radio program, “The Divine Intervention Show,” can be heard on Sundays at 10 p.m. on its flagship station, Hope Radio in New York, on various other radio stations across America, and on the Internet at divineinterventionradio.com. Daniel's own personal testimony of miraculous healings - one from a painful chronic back condition in 2001, and one from a massive, cancerous tumor in 2002, led him to start the Divine Intervention Radio show and book series, in which he interviews intriguing people who have experienced the hand of God in Amazing ways. His additional interests include Biblical apologetics, alternative fuel technologies, networking, reading, writing, economics, cryptozoology, and creation science. Everyday Miracles Pay Homage to Divine Intervention
God’s hand at work in the world, evidenced by powerful personal testimonies Moses parted the Red Sea. Peter healed a man born lame. Jesus calmed a raging storm, healed paralytics, and raised the dead. The Bible contains some incredible stories of miracles and divine interventions, but are these types of events still happening today? The answer to this question, detailed in Daniel Fazzina’s Divine Intervention: 50 True Stories of God’s Miracles Today (Charisma House, August 2014), is an emphatic yes! Contained within the book is a collection of amazing true stories that attest to this fact. You will read astonishing firsthand accounts of people who have been healed of paralysis, "terminal" cancer, and tumors through prayer. You will see the love of God powerfully transform the life of an Islamic terrorist. You will witness the liberation of the demon-possessed, the resurrection of the dead and much more. “The testimonies are true, amazing, and provide unmistakable evidence that God is still intervening in people’s lives today, just as He did during the time the Bible was written,” says Fazzina. “They are from people with diverse cultural and denominational backgrounds from all over the world who give glory to Jesus for their experiences.” The topic resonates with Fazzina on a personal level too. More than ten years ago, he was healed of a painful chronic back condition and a large cancerous tumor in his chest. The doctors said he could be dead within a matter of weeks, but God had other plans for him, and now he is “an ordinary man [who] can not deny there are miracles happening every day.” Daniel Fazzina’s radio program, “The Divine Intervention Show,” can be heard on radio stations across America and on the Internet on divineinterventionradio.com. A native New Yorker, Daniel currently resides in Virginia with his wife.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/666b9/666b935ef2805710b55fedf5f2ec9893a629b7d3" alt="by Bill Seng"
by Bill Seng Reason 10) Truth The Bible tells me the truth about what happened in the past, no matter how ugly it might have been. Atheist, magician, and comedian Penn Jillette has made some outrageous claims against the Bible regarding the types of things that the God of the Old Testament was okay with. One noteworthy concern of his was that in one story it is noted that a woman was “gang-raped and beaten and God being ‘cool’ with it” (Mr. Jillette said this during a Big Think recording, www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3rGev6OZ3w). First off, God was not “cool with it.” Second, the point of the story was not to describe the activity of righteous people living in obedience to God, but wicked people living in rebellion against God. The story he paraphrases is found in Judges 19 and is actually more gruesome than he paraphrases. The book concludes with the words “everyone did as they saw fit,” meaning that there was no moral authority in the land. The Bible does not sugar-coat its history to make it seem as though any person or group of people were perfect. In Genesis, we see Noah get drunk after the flood and Abraham’s nephew, Lot, commit the sin of incest with his own daughters. In Judges, Samson is overcome by lust and marries a woman, Delilah, who conspires to have him arrested. In 2 Samuel, King David, a man described as one after God’s own heart, committed adultery with another man’s wife and then sent the husband off to the front lines of war to be killed. The Bible does not hide the faults of its heroes. One ought to take note of its honesty. Psalm 51 is even entitled, “For the director of music. A psalm of David. When the prophet Nathan came to him after David had committed adultery with Bathsheba.” With such brutal honesty about its fallen heroes, how much more ought we to take note of the good things it says about its triumphant heroes? The sins of those who were models of the faith were so horrible that the story of Jesus is refreshing. Many people fell to Satan’s woos while trying to accomplish God’s will for their lives, but Jesus crushed the head of the serpent under his feet. I believe what the Bible says because the people it describes are just as susceptible to evil as you or me. Even Jesus was tempted with all of the same evils that we have been tempted with. I would encourage everyone to use the truth filter when testing the validity of any message. The Bible passes the test.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88108/8810895a9a2f58135d17706d37c81b446030025c" alt="by Katie Erickson"