Ruth 4:1-4

Posted by Worldview Warriors On Monday, May 5, 2025 0 comments


by Katie Erickson

Meanwhile Boaz went up to the town gate and sat down there just as the guardian-redeemer he had mentioned came along. Boaz said, “Come over here, my friend, and sit down.” So he went over and sat down.
Boaz took ten of the elders of the town and said, “Sit here,” and they did so. Then he said to the guardian-redeemer, “Naomi, who has come back from Moab, is selling the piece of land that belonged to our relative Elimelek. I thought I should bring the matter to your attention and suggest that you buy it in the presence of these seated here and in the presence of the elders of my people. If you will redeem it, do so. But if you will not, tell me, so I will know. For no one has the right to do it except you, and I am next in line.”
“I will redeem it,” he said.
- Ruth 4:1-4

As we begin the final chapter of the book of Ruth, the scene shifts to the town gate, where Boaz, the guardian redeemer, makes a pivotal move toward securing redemption for Ruth and Naomi.

When verse 1 says, “Boaz went up to the town gate and sat down there,” this isn’t just a casual place to catch someone in passing. In the ancient Near East, especially in Israelite society, the town gate was the epicenter of public life—it was the place for legal matters, public announcements, business transactions, and social interaction.

The town gate was functionally a courthouse. Judges, elders, and respected citizens gathered there to make decisions, settle disputes, and validate contracts. It was like a blend between a city hall, a courtroom, and a town square. Boaz knew that if he wanted his business to be conducted lawfully and publicly, it needed to be done at the gate. This move shows both wisdom and integrity. By handling the matter at the gate, Boaz also ensured transparency. The community would witness the transaction, and thus it would be legally binding and socially recognized. In a society without centralized record-keeping or written contracts for the average person, public memory was the legal ledger, and witnesses were your signature.

Boaz doesn’t wait for events to unfold; he takes initiative. Previously in Ruth 3, after Ruth’s bold proposal at the threshing floor, Boaz promises to do things "properly" and by the book. Here, we see him make good on that promise. He goes to the gate early, deliberately positioning himself to meet the other potential redeemer. The term used in Hebrew refers to a kinsman (relative) with the legal responsibility to rescue or redeem a relative in difficulty. This could involve buying back land, avenging wrongful death, or—as in Ruth’s case—marrying a widow to preserve a family line.

Boaz’s character and integrity shine here. Though he clearly cares for Ruth and it appears that he wants to marry her, he gives the nearer kinsman first right of refusal. He doesn't manipulate, deceive, or force the outcome. He operates within the law and cultural norms, putting integrity before personal desire.

Boaz doesn’t approach this alone. Verse 2 says, “Boaz took ten of the elders of the town and said, 'Sit here,' and they did so.” These elders are more than passive observers; they function as legal authorities and cultural anchors.

The number ten was significant in ancient Jewish thought, symbolizing completeness and serving as a quorum for certain public decisions. In rabbinic tradition (which was developed later), ten men form the minimum number required for communal religious activity. While this tradition may not have been formalized in Ruth’s time, the principle of completeness and legitimacy attached to ten elders was already meaningful.

These elders are convened not just to witness a land transaction but a deeply moral act. Boaz is ensuring that Naomi is cared for, Ruth is protected, and Elimelech’s family line continues. These were not small things. The elders validate not only the legality but the righteousness of Boaz’s actions. Their presence adds weight and finality to the proceedings.

Boaz’s words in verses 3-4 are strategic. He first presents the opportunity to redeem the land, which was an attractive offer. The nearer redeemer responds, “I will redeem it.” But Boaz hasn’t mentioned Ruth yet; we’ll see in the next section how that changes the other redeemer’s response. This sequence shows Boaz’s wisdom. He frames the offer, secures interest, then presents the full cost. It’s not manipulation; it’s reality. True redemption is costly.

Boaz’s actions are public and deliberate; he doesn’t redeem Ruth in secret. This reflects a spiritual truth for us, that God’s redemption is also public. Jesus died in a very public way before the watching world, offering a legal and moral satisfaction for sin. The cross, like the town gate, was a place of judgment and reconciliation, though the cross, of course, has significantly greater implications and a wider reach for redemption. The cross of Jesus can redeem the whole world, rather than just one family line.

Boaz stands as a type of Christ, a redeemer who willingly pays the price to restore the broken and secure a future for those without hope. His actions at the gate are a foreshadowing of what Christ would later do: fulfill the law, redeem the undeserving, and bring outsiders (like Ruth) into the covenant community.

Interestingly, the gate is also symbolic in biblical theology. Jesus says in John 10:9, “I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved.” In Ruth, Boaz stands at the gate as a potential redeemer; in the Gospel, Christ is the gate and the true Redeemer of all mankind.

While our human attempts at redemption are beneficial and noble for this life, it is the redemption we receive through faith in Jesus Christ that truly matters.

This forum is meant to foster discussion and allow for differing viewpoints to be explored with equal and respectful consideration.  All comments are moderated and any foul language or threatening/abusive comments will not be approved.  Users who engage in threatening or abusive comments which are physically harmful in nature will be reported to the authorities.

0 comments: